Business & Startups/Markets & Economy

Trump Claims ‘Mission Accomplished’ in Venezuela, But Oil Markets See a $100 Billion Rust Bucket

President Trump wants to flood the market with Venezuelan oil, but rusted rigs and a $100 billion repair bill stand in the way.

Yasiru Senarathna2026-01-05
President Trump and an illustration of the Venezuelan map

President Trump and an illustration of the Venezuelan map

Advertisement

President Trump’s declaration this weekend that U.S. energy giants will “spend billions” to tap Venezuela’s crude reserves following the dramatic capture of Nicolás Maduro was meant to sound like a victory lap. The promise? Cheap gas for Americans and a flooded market that breaks OPEC’s grip.


But the data tells a different story. Trump isn’t inheriting a turnkey oil empire; he’s inheriting a crime scene of industrial neglect.


To restart Venezuela’s petro-heartbeat isn’t just about turning a valve. Experts estimate it requires a staggering $100 billion in capital expenditure and nearly a decade of labor to return to peak output. While the White House eyes $40-a-barrel oil, industry insiders warn that the only thing burning anytime soon will be investor cash.


The Data Sandwich: Why "Drill, Baby, Drill" Hits a Wall


The gap between the President's rhetoric and the logistical reality is roughly 2 million barrels per day.


Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven reserves, 303 billion barrels, eclipsing even Saudi Arabia. Yet, today it pumps a meager 860,000 barrels per day (bpd), a shadow of its 1997 peak of 3 million bpd.


The thesis of a sudden supply flood rests on the assumption that U.S. majors like Chevron and ConocoPhillips can instantly reverse twenty years of rot. They can’t. The pipelines are stripped, the skilled workforce has fled to Houston and Madrid, and the heavy crude in the Orinoco Belt requires specialized diluents that Venezuela no longer produces.


As energy strategist Thomas O'Donnell noted recently, even under a perfect transition, significant ramp-up will take "five to seven years".


The "Burning Billions" Problem


The financial risks for U.S. companies are existential. While Trump promised that American firms would "go in and start making money," the infrastructure reality is dire.


"We aren't talking about maintenance; we are talking about reconstruction," says one Houston-based energy analyst. To restore production to just 2.5 million bpd would require sustained investment over ten years. In the short term, the market impact is negligible.


Furthermore, legal risks loom large. ConocoPhillips is still owed $10 billion from past expropriations. Without ironclad guarantees, which a transitional military government cannot legally provide, Wall Street is unlikely to greenlight the necessary capital.


The OPEC Response: A Quiet Threat


Riyadh is watching with dangerous patience.


The Saudi Energy Minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, has largely kept his powder dry, maintaining OPEC+ production cuts to stabilize a market that saw prices dip 18% in 2025. However, his stance remains clear. In 2023, he famously warned speculators who bet against OPEC's control to "watch out," stating they "will be ouching" if they miscalculate the Kingdom's resolve. That threat still hangs over the market today.


The "Arab Prince response" isn't a press release; it's a price war capability. If the U.S. successfully floods the market with Venezuelan crude, pushing prices below the fiscal breakeven for Gulf states, Saudi Arabia possesses the spare capacity to open its own taps and crash oil to $30, a move that would bankrupt U.S. shale producers far faster than it would hurt Riyadh.


For now, OPEC+ is betting on the physics of rust. They know that Venezuelan oil won't hit the market in volume for years. But if Washington pushes too hard, the "Mission Accomplished" banner could trigger an economic counter-offensive that no one in the West is prepared for.

Advertisement

Read More

Advertisement